EAC Polythene Bill Fails To Pass Again

Share it

EAC Polythene Materials Control Bill may have to wait for another five years to be tabled after Tanzanian failed to submit its amendments to the third East African Legislative Assembly (EALA).

The bill was first tabled by Patricia Hajabakiga (Rwanda) in the 2nd EALA assembly and she re-proposed in 2016 in the current 3rd assembly meaning that the bill has literally been on EALA agenda for almost 10 years.

An attempt to cut this time delay to adopt a committee report on the bill inside the fifth session of the fifth meeting of this year’s assembly in Kigali, Rwanda has proved futile and could see the bill pushed to the forth .

“Tanzania stakeholders were notified to make its suggestions and proposals during a committee information gathering from all five member states in 2016, they (Tanzania) didn’t respond, according to Valerie Nyirahabineza, the committee chairperson on Agriculture, Tourism and Natural resources.

In the bill’s second hearing in Kigali, EALA MPs agreed on the importance of the bill and dangers of polythene bags but agreeing to adopt the committee report to pave way for passing the bill, met challenges.

Some members argued that interests of investors and jobs in plastic manufacturing will be devastated and also asked for more time to educate the community and wait for views from Tanzania.

“There is no way the bill can be passed without views of Tanzania because heads of state will still ascend to adopt and make the comments before the bill is approved as an act. We should wait” Maryam Ussi (Tanzania) said.

Shy-Rose Shadrudin Bhanji also supported the idea of postponing the bill adoption saying that the contribution from Tanzania is needed to have the community move at the same pace.

However, with the eminent dangers posed by polythene bags especially in shopping and packing services in the community, Uganda and Rwanda MPs have no more time to waste..

“We are either choosing life or money here. Rwanda is not surviving on Kaveera investments and taxes. Why can’t we choose life and be like Rwanda where you only see clean roads and cannot see a single road drainage blocked by polythene bags just as in Kampala” Susan Nakawuki (Uganda) said.

Nakawuki said that increase in cancer cases in Uganda has a relation with people over using plastic bags in food packaging and have even gone ahead to use it for cooking matooke and posho, which makes it very dangerous.

A committee report shows that EAC has about five polythene manufacturers (accounting for 10 percent of the EAC investments) who have invested heavily in polythene manufacturing and less has been done in recycling thus creating more environmental menace in the region.

“Management of plastic waste is very costly and this is our problem. Studies show that cost of producing and recycling is one to four. So why have we not been recycling if we think that this is a good business in the region? Hajabakiga said.

A committee report indicates that plastic manufacturers concede that polythene bags are a menace and have asked more time to implement possible bill regulations which will see some of them divert from using polythene to alternative packaging materials- such as sisal, cotton and water weeds or plant fibers.

Findings indicate that it costs about $4000 to recycle one ton of plastics and the profit is you get is equivalent to $ 32.  And a person working in recycle plant earns one cent of a dollar per kilogram of recycled plastic bags made.

Rwanda is the only country that has banned use of plastics since 2004, and Kenya is the only other member state that has today announced a new commitment to ban use of polythene bags, with a six months notice to adhere to the announced in 2017 according Environment and Natural Resources Cabinet Secretary Judi Wakhungu statements this Tuesday.

Tanzania, Uganda and Burundi have made some steps towards educating the community and stakeholders but passing the laws in their individual governments has been blocked along the way.

For some MPs that delaying tricks in passing this bill is a lack of exemplary leadership and adopting to change in EAC when interests of citizen lives are put in danger at expense of investors.

“When we cross to Rwanda we easily adopt to what Rwanda is doing and no one complains, but we find it hard to agree on this bill because when we go back home we continue in the dumping of bottles and plastic bags. Why are we even discussing this bill yet it is evident plastics material are dangerous to the community” said Dora Byamukama (Uganda).

It takes about 400 years for plastics to degrade and delaying this bill will see four decades of the next generation suffer the consequences of the EALA failing to act now.

“Why do we have to make our children suffer in next decades for our inaction. We should act now, no need to wait and ask for more time. Are we serious here…do you mean that we shall have a crisis when we ban plastics? Byamukama asked.

The EALA third assembly adjourned (extended) debate on this bill and deferred adoption of the committee report until the next EALA session which will be in Arusha, Tanzania in May 2017.

“History will judge the EALA session harshly if the bill is not passed immediately in the next meeting. If anyone has anyithng to add to this bill they should do so we don’t fail here” EALA Speaker Daniel Fred Kidega said.

 

 

Tags:

 

About the author

More posts by

 

0 Comments

You can be the first one to leave a comment.

Leave a Comment

 




 

 
 

Warning: Illegal string offset 'id' in /home/wp_ts2em7/rwandaeye.com/wp-content/themes/manifesto/footer.php on line 4

Warning: Illegal string offset 'id' in /home/wp_ts2em7/rwandaeye.com/wp-content/themes/manifesto/footer.php on line 4

Warning: Illegal string offset 'id' in /home/wp_ts2em7/rwandaeye.com/wp-content/themes/manifesto/footer.php on line 4